William & Mary Environmental Law & Policy Review
Volume 28
Issue 1 | Issue 2| Issue 3
Issue 1
SYMPOSIUM ISSUE I
PESTICIDES: WHAT WILL THE FUTURE REAP?
Articles
Pep Fuller & Thomas O. McGarity:
BEYOND THE DIRTY DOZEN: THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION’S CAUTIOUS APPROACH TO LISTING NEW PERSISTENT ORGANIZE POLLUTANTS AND THE FUTURE OF THE STOCKHOLM CONVENTION
Andrew P. Morriss & Roger E. Meiners:
MARKET PRINCIPLES FOR PESTICIDES
Notes
Christopher R. Clements:
NO BLOOD FOR OIL? UNITED STATES NATIONAL SECURITY, OIL, AND THE ARCTIC WILDLIFE REFUGE
Spencer M. Wiegard:
THE BROWNFIELDS ACT: PROVIDING RELIEF FOR THE INNOCENT OR NEW HURDLES TO AVOID CERCLA LIABILITY
Justin W. Stemple:
TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT: THE SUPREME COURT’S REGULATORY TAKINGS JURISPRUDENCE AFTER TAHOE-SIERRA
Issue 2
SYMPOSIUM ISSUE II
PESTICIDES: WHAT WILL THE FUTURE REAP?
Articles
Heidi Gorovitz Robertson:
HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO TELL YOU?!: EPA’S ONGOING STRUGGLE WITH DATA FROM THIRD-PARTY PESTICIDE TOXICITY STUDIES USING HUMAN SUBJECTS
Kristina Thayer & Jane Houlihan:
PESTICIDES, HUMAN HEALTH, AND THE FOOD QUALITY PROTECTION ACT
Sidney A. Shapiro:
THE INFORMATION QUALITY ACT AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION: THE PERILS OF REFORM BY APPROPRIATIONS RIDER
Michael T. Palmer:
THE CHESAPEAKE BAY RESTORATION ACT OF 2000: NEW REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AGENCIES
Avi Brisman:
DOUBLE WHAMMY: COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES OF CONVICTION AND IMPRISONMENT FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Notes
E. Carter Chandler:
LOGGERHEAD TURTLE v. COUNTY COUNCIL: THE FUTURE OF FEE SHIFTING IN ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION?
Issue 3
Articles
Rober F. Blomquist:
IN SEARCH OF THEMIS: TOWARD THE MEANING OF THE IDEAL LEGISLATOR- SENATOR EDMUND S. MUSKIE AND THE EARLY DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 1965-1968
Lucia A. Silecchia:
ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS FROM THE PERSPECTIVES OF NEPA AND CATHOLIC SOCIAL TEACHING: ECOLOGICAL GUIDANCE FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
Essay
Notes
Nate Cihlar:
THE NAVY AND LOW FREQUENCY ACTIVE SONAR: STRIPPING THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF ITS AUTHORITY
Ethan Shaner:
BALANCING CURRENT AND FUTURE DEMANDS FOR COLORADO RIVER WATER WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT
